News and Thoughts

Understand the illegitimacy of our current constitutional state of affairs by watching this series on the Glorious Revolution from 'The Real Magna Carta 1215' channel. Damien Lepts and I have been working through the real history of this period that had largely been hidden until exposure in the 50s/60s and then the 1980s at the 300th anniversary. Although not always rosy, up until 1688/9 the Constitution of England was still based on Natural Justice principles but the Bill of Rights was illegitimate.

The Real Magna Carta 1215 presents another 17th century instalment of the Glorious Revolution. This is chapter two of part four, join Will and myself as we continue to discuss the events of 1688/89. Lots to discuss, including some very questionable moves from both Parliament and William of Orange leading up to the convention. We also dive into the debate on abdication and vacancy. Hope you enjoy and thanks for watching.

Calvin Perrins has an interesting discussion on 'Revive the Table' with Shelby

You may think that ‘tension’ in this context (where the juror finds the judge is telling him the opposite of what he (the juror) knows to be true) is a polite word for something else

Get a grip people, and get behind these causal principles if freedom is what you really want. As always it’s completely up to you. Your freedom is yours for the taking, but only by facing truth and reality

Damien has published the next part of our 'Glorious' Revolution series. The last recording session resulted in a lot more material so there are parts coming. Enjoy the artwork!

Part 3 of this series in which the positive revelations begin to surface and we can start to draw the critical conclusions regarding the nature of Objective Morality and Natural Law

This is a profoundly important and interesting conversation with Lou in which we analyse Justice Saini's Judgement which is extremely revealing about the state's attitudes, beliefs and awkwardness surrounding the central issue of Jury Independence or Jury Equity.

Those who support this Bill of Rights and say it has “constitutional authority” are either knowing traitors or speaking without perusal and knowledge of the subject.The 1689 Bill of Rights is illegal and defunct.

Part 2 goes into the nature of the human psyche and demonstrates that although conscience is an important path of reason for coming to recognise right and wrong behaviour, it is not enough without the necessary internal work

The mistake that Larken has made is thinking that the jury is just a fact finding mission only when in fact the jury is the people governing themselves in conscience. We’re all part of a community so crime is answerable before the community, through a jury, so that correction can take place to ensure societal cohesion...

"Across the Darling Downs it went, across the Liverpool Plains, It swallowed up the open runs, it swallowed up the rains. It thickened into walls of green that no man’s horse could breach, It took the land the selectors held and all beyond their reach."