News and Thoughts #Trial by Jury

Get a grip people, and get behind these causal principles if freedom is what you really want. As always it’s completely up to you. Your freedom is yours for the taking, but only by facing truth and reality

This is a profoundly important and interesting conversation with Lou in which we analyse Justice Saini's Judgement which is extremely revealing about the state's attitudes, beliefs and awkwardness surrounding the central issue of Jury Independence or Jury Equity.

The mistake that Larken has made is thinking that the jury is just a fact finding mission only when in fact the jury is the people governing themselves in conscience. We’re all part of a community so crime is answerable before the community, through a jury, so that correction can take place to ensure societal cohesion...

"Across the Darling Downs it went, across the Liverpool Plains, It swallowed up the open runs, it swallowed up the rains. It thickened into walls of green that no man’s horse could breach, It took the land the selectors held and all beyond their reach."

Some thoughts and suggested arguments and approaches

Right, let's get behind this. We've got until 10th March - just over a week.

Last night and this morning, a couple of us engaged in conversation a gentleman (I will call ‘J’) about Constitutional matters and the state of things currently...

So, humanity has to move its consciousness to the plane of causality, the realm of ‘why’. ‘Why’ are we in chaos and being coerced by tyrannical institutions? All power to effect change is in the plane of causality. The manifested reality, or the effects that society is enduring, is a result of the prime causes.

We need to trust our fellow men within the process of Trial by Jury—for there is more present in that room than just the Twelve

A discussion about some of the most critical subjects facing us right now

A Time of Desperation

If we know that the Trial by Jury is the bulwark, the cornerstone, the foundation of our criminal justice system, a ‘little parliament’, ‘the lamp which shows that freedom lives’, a protection against unjust legislation — how can it be lawful for the state to legislate to remove or restrict it?