News and Thoughts #Constitution

If we know that the Trial by Jury is the bulwark, the cornerstone, the foundation of our criminal justice system, a ‘little parliament’, ‘the lamp which shows that freedom lives’, a protection against unjust legislation — how can it be lawful for the state to legislate to remove or restrict it?

"I’ve been blocked by many “truthers” on X simply for pointing out the dynamics that govern our reality and why our Constitution is legitimate. Their counter arguments confirmed to me that they have no intention of addressing causal factors but wish to remain in a loop of hopelessness, attention seeking, distraction and endless waffle disguised as altruism. Is there any help for people that choose to ignore the dynamics of reality? Is it a case of unchecked ego or is it something else?"

An invitation to lawyers and public servants to have a discussion about Constitutional qualms you may be having as a result of the furore about Trial by Jury

After the last video and after further research, we felt we needed to do a second part to focus on some remarkable finds, including an orchestrated plan to infilitrate and weaken Jame's army from within

Imagine how much of the nation’s spirit could be lifted if people were empowered with the knowledge that the Constitution, of which the King swore to uphold and protect (the law of the land trial by jury), not only emplaces the people as the final arbiter of law in jury independence but also, because of equity, anyone can place evidence of crimes, which includes crimes of government, before a jury of peers?

The legal profession are standing up for Trial by Jury—your most important defence mechanism against unlawful and unjust legislation. But, there is a very prevalent and dangerous mis-understanding…

People must notice the problem with allowing the state to decide which trials will get a jury and which will not... which offences will be sequestered away from scrutiny by the people, and which will not...

This very framework of justice must never become the property of our public servants. Not recognising that, doing nothing about it, not calling it out whilst being concerned about your lack of freedom could probably be described as mentally deficient or intellectually impaired

So, it seems to me that what we really fear is what will the other members of our community stand-by and allow to happen to us? And, what will the other members of our community participate in facilitating? Or, what will I allow to happen to my fellow men before I stand up?

Some will not like this message but it needs to be said. Watch carefully even within the freedom movement for 'Constitution deniers'.

The problems I have described regarding immorality and order-following persist - in the police and the public more generally, and the solutions to those problems are timeless. In this essay I signpost to the fundamental knowledge which must be gained by all of us if we are to evolve.

Really enjoyed my conversation with Clare. Do share it far and wide