Debate

You must be asking how it is that we do consent, or not, to the rules given to us by parliament... because we surely must consent, else we would just be following orders - which is obviously immoral and was specifically outlawed at Nuremberg.

Trial by Jury, on the other hand, still relies on the people, but in a way where they are making a focused decision, in a room with 11 other people from different walks of life, with different experiences and so on. The views of each and every one of them will be put on the mat and they cannot just leave the discussion or flounce-off in the same way they can in social discussion or on social media

By the very nature that we are interacting with others means that the judgement of any potential wrong-doing cannot merely be our own

The English Law tradition contains those principles that you can’t argue with. You have no choice about adhering to those principles or prerequisites if you want harmony to result in your community. Not including those principles would ALWAYS result in chaos - even if the unraveling would take time.